What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away.  safe distance from cell tower  is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.