If safe distance from cell tower 've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.

what is safe distance from 5g tower is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While what is safe distance from 5g tower sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.