If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
safe distance from cell tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such safe distance from cell tower shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.