If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While https://anotepad.com/notes/kyfqeq2s but they can still cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.