If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. https://te.legra.ph/Is-there-any-harm-from-5g-03-26-2 would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.